Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Ah Seng finally learned that bombers does not leave their bombs

Moscow train bombing News URL

Russian blast accomplices caught on camera

Security officials in Russia say they have made important breakthroughs in the investigation into the fatal bombing of the Moscow metro.

Russian police say video surveillance has revealed the two suspected suicide bombers had accomplices.

They are searching for two women and a man seen with the suspected bombers at a metro station outside central Moscow on the morning of the attack.

Moscow's Echo radio is also reporting there is new evidence that links the suspects to Chechnya.

The station says a private bus driver has confirmed he drove the suspected bombers and a man from the Chechen capital, Grozny, to Moscow.

Last month a Chechen militant leader warned that war would be coming to Russian cities.

The developments come as Russians observe a day of mourning for the 39 people killed in the twin suicide bombings.

People have been lighting candles and laying flowers in memory of the victims of Monday's peak-hour attacks.

President Dmitry Medvedev has ordered increased security and suggested anti-terrorism laws could be reformed.

Prime minister Vladimir Putin has visited the injured at a hospital in Moscow and says law enforcement agencies will do everything to find and punish the criminals.

He ordered security forces to find the organisers, saying they should be "scraped out from the bottom of the sewers".

"We know that they [the organisers] are lying low," he said, quoted by the ITAR-TASS and RIA-Novosti state news agencies.

"But it is now a matter of honour for the security forces to scrape them out from the bottom of the sewers and bring them out into the light of day.

"This will be done."

His language was strikingly reminiscent of his famous promise in 1999 to strike at rebels in the "outhouse" which heralded the adoption of tougher tactics by the authorities against Chechen militants.

- ABC/BBC/Reuters

Singaporean MRTs had hourly repeated their train bombing video clips for years, showing how they are on alert of bombs left on their trains. But we all knew that their lame security measures are just poor propaganda shows, totally naive and impractical. The real terrorists would be willing to kill themselves on their missions, far from the childish version as shown on MRTs' boring lame video clips, which is very disconnected from the reality.

These video clips indicated that famiLEE LEEgime is really out of touch with real security treats and they are unable to deal with the real business of terrorism. If they got hit, they are far from knowing what to do. Their poor idea of how terrorist may actually carry out their attacks proved it. Their assumptions are totally wrong that terrorists are themselves afraid to die in their attacks is now proven wrong in Moscow.

I would like to point out that famiLEE LEEgime / Ah Seng WKS's whole strategy of defense against terrorist attacks mainly depending on surveillance and scarecrow security petrols etc is wrong and ineffective. Naive and unsafe. The real terrorist are prepared to die on their missions, they have nothing to fear, cameras or bag checking or petrol teams have no real effect of deterrence, if these real terrorists got stopped withing the same crowded MRT stations, the end result is not much different from what the attackers' intention would be. Just loud bang and lots of corpses all over the MRT station as well.

So what do you do now Ah Seng? GE2010 is coming!

Sammyboy.Com Thread URL

Sunday, March 28, 2010

famiLEE LEEgime 154th started Election Shit Stir - Will Never Work

famiLEE LEEgime have nothing more to crap out of their lame ass for this GE. They dug their own lame ass deep and could come out with stale lame craps about Mr. Chiam & Dr CSJ, which desperately the famiLEE LEEgime are trying to stir.

But it will never work. It will never help them. Regardless how desperate they are.

Why the 154th don't write about how famiLEE tries to force Goh Choke Dong out of PMO and how he had resisted? That will be more interesting.



I ask Singaporeans to stay smart and alert. Learn how to see through the lame childish trick of famiLEE LEEgime.

My message to oppositions for this GE: Eliminate Any 3-corner fight, keep any disputes out of LEEgime's media. Try to act as mediator and middle-man for other parties if you are in position to resolve any potential 3-corner or other GE issues. Keep these news away from LEEgime's outdated and 154th class media. Issue your own join statements after you resolve issues. Use the NEW MEDIA as much as possible. The idea is to Teach Lee Kuan Yew Old Dog Thief that his media are becoming useless, and we are in control instead of his famiLEE.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Obama may be on his way to redeem part of his own Deficit in Peace Merit

Related News URL

Russia, U.S. will cut nuclear arms by 30 per cent.

U.S. President Barack Obama announced Friday the most comprehensive nuclear arms control deal in a generation, saying it trims the nuclear weapons deployed by the United States and Russia by 30 per cent.

Speaking at the White House, Obama said he sealed the agreement with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in a phone call Friday morning - following months of negotiations between the two countries.

``Today, we have taken another step forward in leaving behind the legacy of the 20th century while building a more secure future for our children,'' Obama said.

The accord would impose a cap on deployed ballistic missiles at 1,550 warheads.

The U.S. president has made arms reduction a central part of his administration's foreign policy, saying in a landmark speech in Prague last year that he seeks the eventual elimination of nuclear weapons.

Obama and Medvedev will sign the new deal in a ceremony next month in Prague.

The deal replaces the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which expired in December 2009. The U.S. Congress and the Russian parliament have yet to ratify the new agreement, which gives Obama a strong card to play at a summit in Washington next month aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear material to terrorists. More than 40 countries have been invited to take part, among them Canada.

About 95 per cent of the world's nuclear weapons are in the hands of the U.S. and Russia, according to the Centre for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation.

``With this agreement, the United States and Russia - the two largest nuclear powers in the world - also send a clear signal that we intend to lead, '' Obama said.

He added that the commitments of the two nations will ``strengthen our global efforts to stop the spread of these weapons, and to ensure that other nations meet their own responsibilities.''

Related Previous Blog Post URL

There is still a huge deficit of merits with Obama receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, I insist that he really don't deserve this award at the time he received it. The above URL of blog posting was published by me in Oct 2009 regarding this.

In this week's news there is however an indication that Obama may be on his way to redeem part of this deficit of merits, by renewal of nuclear armament reduction treaty between US & Moscow. This is a good sign, but the treaty is not yet signed at this time.

The treaty in interest of peace was done in 1991 by Ronald Reagan & Gorbachev, and had already expired last year in the hands of Obama & Medvedev, it is thus the task of both of them to have it renewed. It is obvious that the renewal had been over-due since last year.

As it is at the moment there is no effective treaty in force, meaning neither US nor Russia are obligated to remain in reduction of nuclear arms, and any of them could load more warheads into missiles free from binding by any treaty. Only when the new treaty had been signed became effective, then we can consider Obama had really redeemed part of his deficit in merits for peace. An honor must be awarded after and not before the merits had been materialized. Strictly speaking the merits for this renewal of treaty have to be split equally between Obama & Medvedev, instead of just crediting Obama alone as the actual contribution could not had been achieved unilaterally.

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

LEEgime 911, Ass Loong targeted by terrorist?

CNA Breaking News URL


DSO National Laboratories examining letter to PM

DSO National Laboratories examining letter to PM

SINGAPORE: The DSO National Laboratories is examining a letter addressed to the Prime Minister.

A police spokesperson confirmed that the letter was received at the Istana at around 8pm on Monday.

SCDF conducted tests using detectors and did not find any traces of hazardous materials.

The letter, which was typewritten and consisted of a few pages, has been sent to the DSO National Laboratories for further checks.

— CNA/sc

DSO! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!

If they failed to find out what is inside the mail, let me offer them a little hint here:

It is called PEASANTS' ANGER.

Very harmful and toxic poison. For especially this Election Year.


originally from here

Sammyboy.Com Thread

Walk vs Procession judgement on 1.April.2010

High court's email informed me that on Thursday 1st.April.2010, the verdict will be delivered for prosecution's appeal against 5 activists' acquittals. It will be in court 6C at 10am. That mean it clashed with my other trial at sub court 10, which is a GE2006 case of Speech.

By the courts practice sub court will make changes in trial schedule for High Court which has priority.

Sammyboy.Com Thread URL

Monday, March 22, 2010

The REAL 1st World - every citizen will have access to superfast broadband

Related UK Telegraph News Clip URL

Broadband and personalised services online for all, says Brown

Gordon Brown has promised universal broadband access and personalised online services for every citizen

Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, today outlined a vision of a digital Britain in which every citizen will have access to superfast broadband and a personalised, online “dashboard” of government services.

Announcing the launch of “MyGov”, the Prime Minister said that government services in 2020 would be akin to internet banking or online shopping. He said a single website would offer people the chance to “manage their pensions, tax credits or child benefits; pay their council tax; fix their doctors or hospital appointment and control their own treatment; apply for the schools of their choice and communicate with their children's teachers; or get a new passport or driving licence - all when and where they need it”.

Mr Brown also announced that £30 million would be spent on establishing a new Institute of Web Science to be jointly headed by the founder of the world wide web, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, and Prof Nigel Shadbolt, who was involved in the recent release of government data via Martha Lane-Fox, the co-founder of, will also help Mr Brown to establish a new Digital Public Services Unit in the Cabinet Office in Downing Street. The aim, he said, was to make sure that the “4 million people who are among the heaviest users of government services - but who have never used the internet – [are] at the heart of our strategy rather than letting them literally slip through the digital net.”

Faster and more widely available access would, Mr Brown argued, foster a new approach to government from both citizens and public servants. He was criticised, however, for supporting the Digital Economy Bill, which is currently going through Parliament, because it threatens to disconnect filesharers. Campaigners such as the Open Rights Group accused Mr Brown of making online services central to government while also threatening to remove a number of people's web access.

Mr Brown offered neither any new funding nor a timescale for universal broadband provision, although the Government has already announced that 90 per cent of homes will have access to “superfast” connections by 2017. The Conservatives said that they had already made a similar promise, and attacked the Government's fortchoming £6 per phone line tax.

Downing Street also announced its own iPhone application, offering users quick access to the latest "news, video and audio from the Downing Street website".

Here is my very humble and reasonable challenge to famiLEE LEEgime, provide the following to Singaporeans within 12 months:

  1. Basic 5Mbps with monthly capacity quota @15GB per citizen. Accessible from home & public WLAN hotspot & 3G mobile.
  2. Unlimited FOC access to educational sites only for Singaporean students only.
  3. Unlimited access to national & governmental sizes; including connections to medical services & local news.

Have all the ISPs cater for these, subsidized by state. Then additional speed & capacities & features can be paid services provided by these ISPs.

I have not proposed something out of the world, or something unrealistic, these are reasonable and these are affordable. These will make Singapore more realistically First World, without being a joke. This is good for our nation and people.

Revise these specifications every 6 monthly, and adjust it according to technological changes and national budget. That is IDA's job, but I already contributed my idea FOC. Give it to the people!


Sammyboy.Com Thread

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Video Interview: HDB Repossession Woe - you jump is your own business

Video Interview Part 1:

Video Interview Part 2:

Video Interview Part 3:

I interviewed on video a Mr. Lee, who I had met more than a decade ago at work. We met again recently, after not seeing each other for this long time. I found out that his 4 room flat in Yishun Ring Road is repossessed by HDB, and he suffer a huge painful and unfordable loss over S$100K.

He bought his flat in 1997 at about S$275K, and according to housing agents, the market price is above S$300K currently. The HDB of famiLEE LEEgime repossessed it in 2008 at only S$182K, that means HDB could sell it with over S$100K profits after Mr. Lee's family is evicted.

He had seen famiLEE LEEgime's MP Associate Professor Ho Peng Kee 4 to 5 times, asking help over a period of more than a year fruitlessly. LEEgime basically will still eat Mr. Lee alive, and had him kicked out of his home.

No financial assistance schemes nor employment assistance were offered by Ho Peng Kee.

No HDB Rental Scheme was offered. Basically Ho Peng Kee had kept offering Mr. Lee SG citizenship. His terms are unless you converted to pink NRIC, I am not able to help you. I did not asked but I believe that Mr. Lee does not want SG citizenship, and despite his plight, LEEgime's citizenship mongering did not work on him. :-)

I think what LEEgime want is Mr. Lee's vote, because PR can not vote, therefore he must be converted 1st to SG citizen, then after Ho Peng Kee can demand his vote.

Mr. Lee is Malaysian citizen, but his sons are studying in SG and the elder son is already serving NSF in the SAF. Mrs Lee washes dishes and is paid about S$1000, Mr. Lee at his age of 50, has no stable income job for the past years. But he did quite well during those years when I met him, and not long after that he bought this flat, and then later things turned very bad and life became hard for him. He did not expect this. He realized that he will make huge loss that his family can not absorb, if he sold that flat in order to stop owing mortgage installment arrears.

He let that dragged on and now he is in very deep troubles.

HDB is frequently hounding his family like debt collectors, and they seek only to evict him ASAP.

When he was so depressed, he came closing to jumping off the building, the officers from HDB didn't sympathize his hardship, nor live and death, they just want to get their jobs done, by having Mr. Lee's family evicted.

As a result of these eviction harassments, Mr. Lee's 2 sons no longer dare to live there, and moved to live with relatives.

I see Mr. Lee struggling on the edge of becoming another homeless in Singapore. I think the only thing I can do to be of help to him is to do this interview, and put on YouTube & on my blog.

I will offer to do similar interview to any Singaporean peasants, suffering oppression and hardship. Email me for arrangement, the only condition is they must speak the truth on the video.

Sammyboy.Com Thead

Related Chinese Blog Post

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Appeal Judgement Reserved at High Court Today

The appeal by prosecution against acquittals of 5 activists had been heard this whole morning at Court 6C, at the Supreme Court Level 6. The first of one of such appeals.

The judgment was reserved by Justice Choo Han Teck.

I had argued that the District Court had made the right judgment, and these appeals should had been dismissed, as there was only a walk and no procession.

I reiterated that I was not wearing the same Democracy Now / Freedom Now T-shirt, nor I had any mutual agreement with any other persons to be a part of any activities organized for that day, 16 September 2007 which had been proved in the evidence at District Court. I was there at a public place individually and independently to make observations and take photos and videos as a blogger just like the other bloggers and reporters who were also there. If ANYONE who simply just WALKED the same route is considered as taking part in the alleged procession then they must convict the police (half a dozen of matas) who also followed the journey. ;-)

Therefore the prosecutors' position is self-conflicting.

I raised evidence using parliamentary proceeding (Hansads) that Wong Kan Seng & Ho Peng Kee had both announced their UNLAWFUL policies to have Singapore Police Force not granting any permits to outdoor political activities unless they are held within stadiums where outbreak of disorderliness can be easily contained. This policy is UNLAWFUL because it is not supported by any legislations, unless there is legislation supporting blanket ban against outdoor political activities, THE COURTS NOT BINDED. This discrimination against political activities apart from other activities is unlawful and unconstitutional.

I insisted that all citizens and members of public have the same rights and lawfulness to use the public roads and walkways to convey themselves like any other road users, as long as they WALKED and used the passage just like any other road users, and no permits must be required for them to do that. Any discrimination otherwise is unlawful.

It was found in District Court's trial that the activists on 16 September 2007 were using the sidewalks and roads lawfully in no way different from other users of these public roads, no processions was ever formed.

I argued that since the prosecution agreed that the legislation in force did not provided any specific definition on what they called Procession, therefore it was meant that the Ordinary Meaning of this English word applies, just in the same language as the legislations were made in. Then the dictionary's definitions will suffices.

the act of moving along or proceeding in orderly succession or in a formal and ceremonious manner, as a line of people, animals, vehicles, etc.
the line or body of persons or things moving along in such a manner.
Ecclesiastical. an office, litany, etc., said or sung in a religious procession.
Theology. the emanation of the Holy Spirit from the Father and later, in the Western Church, from the Son: distinguished from the “generation” of the Son and the “unbegottenness” of the Father.
the act of coming forth from a source.
–verb (used without object)
to go in procession.
Use procession in a Sentence
See images of procession
Search procession on the Web
bef. 1150; early ME (<>

I illustrated that NDP; Religious (Taoist Thaipusam) Processions; Wedding & Funeral Processions are processions because of their formal and ceremonious natures. In contrary a normal Walk by pedestrians lacks these features, which made the differences between a procession and a walk. When there is a procession it is seen and recognized by other road users and they will respect and avoid the procession as a whole moving contingent and stop to make way for the procession to pass as a whole. On 16 September 2007, that was not a procession because the activists use the road mixed together with ordinary crowds.

Their journey of 12 Km was interrupted by stoppages at various buildings randomly and individually by each activists, it was not a continuous flow like a procession, due to the long distance and time, the various activists of different physical abilities and health limitations, they were not able to keep up in any form of fixed and orderly formation with each other. Therefore it was physically not visible as a procession, this was what I witnessed and testified. And the Straits Times Reporter Mr. Jeremy Au Yong also testified the same, the police witnesses also have no conflict with these facts.

The prosecution then tried to submit on the new POA's (Public Order Act 2009) widened definitions on Procession, I asked the judge to disregard all these POA arguments as new legislation or changed legislation 2 years after 2007 can not retrospectively apply to the activity done 2 years before these new laws. Similarly appealed or abolished legislation cease to take effect after their abolishments.

I want to highlight to the Internet Community that famiLEE LEEgime failed entirely to provide any definition of Procession, just as well in the same act they had produced erroneous and invalid definition of area to charge opposition activists. In one case their definitions was done wrongly and in this case entirely omitted. ;-)

An assistant professor of law from NUS M/S Cheah Wei Ling was called by the High Court to offer her opinion in law and suggestions. Her conclusion as she told court was that the activists behaviors on 16. September 2007 did not fall into the category of activity as Misc Offenses Act and Rules was meant to forbid.

This was same as one of the points I had made today, that the Title of the Act is MOA (Public Order and Nuisance) which is obviously clear that anything that did not cause public order and nuisance concerns isn't what this law tried to address. The District Court already correctly found that the activities on 16. Sept.2007 was not of any public order and nuisance concern. It was a walk instead of a procession.


Sammyboy.Com Thread

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Small Matters Exposed Huge Incompetence

ST news URL

Mar 13, 2010

Passport service on hold

The Immigration & Checkpoints Authority has suspended over-the-counter passport applications for a week due to an overwhelming surge in customers. -- ST PHOTO: MALCOLM MCLEOD

IN AN unprecedented move, the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) has suspended over-the-counter passport applications.

There will be no walk-in passport applications from now until next Saturday. This also includes passport renewals.

Instead, the ICA is asking Singaporeans to apply by post, drop their passports off at a box outside the ICA building or to apply online.

Passport collection today is also strictly by appointment and no walk-in customers will be accepted.

Singapore citizens can make such appointments at the ICA website.

The move is due to an overwhelming surge in customers.

Wong Kan Seng does not need Mas Selamat's escape to prove his HOME TEAM's INCOMPETENCE. All it takes is this simple Singapore passport.

Ministry of Home Affairs can put our rights and needs ON HOLD? Passport is our rights and needs, and the bloody famiLEE LEEgime had been notoriously abusive in depriving citizens to get replacement passport when their passport got either stolen, robbed, or ruined on a trip or at home. This abuse is in addition to the high amount of fees.

Now it come to the extend of unable to cope with Counter Service, and then they can CONVENIENTLY SHUT DOWN THEIR COUNTERS!

Can Singaporean peasants also continently put LEEgime ON HOLD when they extort fees; levies; tax; CPF contributions; $$$fines$$$; $$$GST$$$ etc?

Their excuse is so absurd! How can they be not paying back for this at the ballot boxes?

Peasants better know what to do!

The ICA had an brunch passport office at Joo Chiat Complex a long time ago, when they were still called the Immigration Department. And Ah Seng closed it down to save cost. This is the first world govt you had paid the world's highest salaries for!

Ah Seng better jolly well open as many brunch offices and passport counters as Singaporeans need it. This is a Duty and Obligation that he can not be allowed to fail to fulfill. The thick sink refused to resign despite being called by highest record number of Singaporeans. Therefore he must be ousted by votes this GE, there is no 2 ways about it.

Further forgiveness will be deemed as stupidity in this case. Meanwhile Ah Seng's salaries must also be put ON HOLD just like Singaporean's passports.

Sammyboy.Com thread

Saturday, March 13, 2010

100 FREE BUSSES vs S$2000 fines

I am still awaiting to read DJ Chia Wee Kiat's GD (grounds of decisions) after famiLEE LEEgime wanted me to pay S$2000 fines for Tak Boleh Tahan cases, which I am not even a part of that campaign. After reading the GD I will decide on what to do about it. On 11.Mar.2010 at court 24, I asked the judge to elaborate in his writings, about how he had decided that an erroneous legislation can be still useful for convicting 19 accused persons for 37 charges, when the subsequently corrected legislation does not effect retrospectively back to 15.Mar.2008 as prosecution and judge both agreed on this point of law, after the corrections were done by legislators and acknowledged in the trials some time in late 2008.

The legislation after it's corrections in it's definition of Boundary of Area, which corrected Old Parliament Lane plus East Bank of Singapore River, still contain an uncorrected 3rd mistake which I had discovered and pointed out in court. Which is the fact that Old Parliament Lane no longer reach East Bank of Singapore River and thus left a big opening in the boundary which they had intended to define.

What I want to highlight today is a comparison against what happened to the 18 TBT Red Shirts vs the fact that Thai PM Abhisit is Providing 100 Free Bus to transport the Red Shirt protesters who are ousting him from his office. He also promise police actions to be non-violence and that can be contrasted against the police brutality and abuses by famiLEE LEEgime on TBT in 15.Mar.2008
News URL

Thai Protesters Converge on Bangkok in Bid to Oust Abhisit

March 13, 2010, 12:44 AM EST

By Anuchit Nguyen

March 13 (Bloomberg) -- Thousands of Thai protesters began converging on Bangkok today for a weekend rally that aims to topple Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva’s government.

About 20,000 people from 11 northern provinces began moving in a convoy of pickup trucks and motorcycles that stretched more than 10 kilometers (6.2 miles), the state-owned NBT television network reported from Nakhon Sawan, about 200 kilometers from the capital.

The United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship, which backs fugitive ex-leader Thaksin Shinawatra, aims to muster a million people to pressure Abhisit into calling an election. The protest is the latest in a power struggle mostly between the urban elite and rural poor that has been marked by airport blockades and rioting since the military ousted Thaksin in 2006.

“The government has no plan to use violence against the protesters,” Abhisit said today after meeting military and police commanders. “We will take all necessary actions to facilitate the rally in a peaceful way.”

Some 200,000 anti-government protesters across Thailand’s 76 provinces took part in local demonstrations yesterday before heading to the capital, said Sean Boonpracong, a spokesman for the demonstrators. Plans by the group to march on major traffic arteries in the city were “overhyped,” he said yesterday.

The government invoked the Internal Security Act for the sixth time since Abhisit took office, allowing the military to close roads and make arrests. Some 35,000 security officers and 46,000 civilian defense volunteers were ready to be deployed.

Smuggled Weapons

Checkpoints at the main entry points to Bangkok aim to ensure protesters don’t smuggle weapons into the capital, Abhisit said today. The government will provide about 100 buses to transport people to the protest sites, he said.

Thaksin has orchestrated protests from Dubai and other overseas locations since fleeing a Thai jail sentence in 2008. He and his allies have won the past four elections on votes from the northeast, Thailand’s poorest region and home to a third of its 66 million people.

Courts have disbanded the pro-Thaksin parties that won the past two elections, prompting his supporters to question the judicial system. Abhisit’s Democrat party hasn’t won the most seats in a nationwide vote since 1992. He must call an election by the end of next year.

In a post in Thai on his Twitter page early today, Thaksin said he was preparing to leave Dubai to join his two daughters in Europe.

--Editor: Tony Jordan, Malcolm Scott.

Sammyboy.Com Thread





Thursday, March 11, 2010

Death Penalty: Taiwan totally opposite of Singapore's situation

I must highlight this irony. Taiwanese Minister of Law aka 法务部长 王清风, is currently willing to take herself to hell 下地狱, so to speak, to fight for Abolishment of Death Penalty, as the angry peasants and policemen are protesting against him, and they really want their Minister of Law to be in hell. These roles are entirely switched in Singapore as famiLEE LEEgime ministers are the ones wanting to impose Death Penalty, and there are groups of peasants protesting and seeking the abolishment of it.

There is now a petitioning campaign against Taiwanese Minister of Law by Taiwanese Peasants, and Netizens, they want to each write in a letter against this minister, to have to removed from office. The policemen demanded minister Wang to donate her SALARIES to feed those convicts on the death row.

There is also a group of families of victims of crimes, who suffered from the crimes committed by the convicts on death row. They are outraged by the minister. They are also campaigning against the minister who wants to abolish death penalty.

Currently there are some notorious convicts awaiting to be executed, and by Taiwanese law that meant Firing Squad or Gun Shot Executions. This is the reason that sparked on this conflict.

Related Yahoo Taiwan News URL

堅持廢除死刑 網友:1人1信送王清峰下地獄

更新日期:2010/03/11 00:07 政治中心/綜合報導

法務部長王清峰發 表一篇名為《理性與寬恕》的文章,強調為了確保生命權,任內絕對不會執行死刑,甚至「願意為死刑犯下地獄」。不過,這番看似充滿「人道理念」的言論,卻讓 不少網友感到相當憤怒,痛批王清峰保障死囚的生命權,「卻枉顧被害人的生命」,要大家發起「一人一信送王清峰下地獄」的活動,叫王清峰趕快「下台」。





  • 堅持廢除死刑 網友:1人1信送王清峰下地獄 NOWnews


  • Thread

    Tuesday, March 09, 2010

    Tak Boleh Tahan virdict date changed to 11.Mar.2010

    Related Blog Post URL

    Part 1. Main Submissions

    Main Point #1

    There is nothing more important than this first point of my submission. That is the legislators had by amendments on the relevant schedule S585/2008 on 12.Nov.2008 indicating 2 points of corrections which is originated from the legislators. Namely, the boundary definition by

    (a) Old Parliament Lane &

    (b) East Bank of Singapore River.

    This is the result of submissions by defense in this case at the beginning stage of this trial.

    These corrections is the acknowledgments by the Legislators, of their mistakes made within the relevant legislations, which all the charges in this case are based on.

    This is NOT a redefinition of area nor an update to reflect latest names of these places, because Singapore River had not been changed and Parliament Lane had been changed for already 10 years, and instead this had been mistake made since 2002, that these legislative errors had been made since the very beginning of these legislation.

    The necessity of these corrections from the legislators has the most important binding effects for courts of Singapore to consider the erroneous legislation as ineffective, for their intended purposes. The courts does not have the function to make corrected reading of legislation, it is the part of legislators to correct them.

    When legislators had failed their purposes of legislation, it should not be the function of courts to substitute the roles of legislators, to impose any corrections or by reading the legislations other than literally. For example, if the legislation error was one of wrongly specifying maximum penalty from 10 stroke of cane to 1 stroke instead, then courts should not impose 5 strokes which is in excess of the standing legislations, and sentences made in violation of erroneous legislation should also be deem as invalid or null & void.

    Citizens have no obligation of upholding ineffective legislations nor complying with invalid sentences. Although the intention of the erroneous legislation could be understood.

    For the purpose of completeness, I must also highlight that the corrected and currently standing legislation still has yet another mistake, which I had pointed out in the trial, which is the fact that Old Parliament Lane does not have any junction with East Bank of Singapore River. The stretch of Promenade in between Empress Place Building (Asian Civilization Museum) & Old Parliament is still missing from the legislation, and should be inserted into the legislation for the definition of area to be meaningful and comprehensible.

    As charges are made out of erroneous legislations, they similarly lack the effectiveness in law, and I plea with the court to have the charges dismissed, as this is the most appropriate resolution with this reason after years of trial. CPC allows judge to dismiss case at any stage.

    This is the 1st Page of my unusually short closing submission which is only 5 to 6 pages.

    It will be 9:30am 11 March 2010 instead of 8 March 2010. Court #24 at Sub Courts.

    I appreciate that DJ Chia is the most patience judge I ever encountered in this LEEgime during this trial from 2008 through 2009 till 2010. But I am prepared to defy conviction and sentence for the 2 charges I face in this Tak Boleh Tahan case, including many options that I might adopt, and which I had never done before. The sole reason for this which is what entire world can see that the legislation: Miscellaneous Offenses Act (Public Order and Nuisance) (Prohibition of Assemblies and Processions - Parliament & Supreme Court Order) is made so broken right from the very first day of it legislation beginning from very first version of it's Description of Area contained in Schedule to the Order which was first made in 30 Oct 2002, and then continued to be similarly broken after revision in 22 July 2005, which is the only version the charge can be based on, and continued to be so broken even after this trial had exposed 2 of it's mistakes, which had been corrected within few months from discoveries found in this trial, that the current version made on 13 Nov 2008 still contain another mistake which I discovered and highlighted on my blog in Dec 2009, that Old Parliament Lane no longer reach the East Bank of Singapore River since the Singapore river promenade was built so many years ago. Therefore the legislation is erroneous itself which seriously failed to define any area as it had intended to prohibit assemblies and processions which TBT charges were all about, and thus charge relying on it can not stand, and thus any conviction in accordance to it can not be valid, and if made can not be upheld or complied by lawful citizens and members of public.

    I feel bad for DJ Chia to be in the awful position to deliver a difficult judgment caused by the faulty legislation which is not the court's fault. In my closing submission, I emphasized this as the most important issue to be considered in this case, and uniquely this case.

    For all the 8 activists who pleaded guilty most of them (except for Ng E-Jay who PG before this was discovered) had PG by ignoring this issue, and all of them pleaded guilty not for anything other than their inability to afford the time needed for this trial spanned 3 years from 2008 to 2010. Their convictions had been made as a miscarriage of justice, for several reasons:

    • The law / legislation under which they had been convicted had completely failed to define any area of prohibition.
    • The trial for a total of 19 persons and 37 charges (Francis Yong face only 1 charge instead of 2 like the rest) was joint together despite repeated strong objections as well as repeated application to disjoint, that the trial is unfordable and unnecessarily long for most of the defendants. That being forced to plead guilty became the only way for defendants to break away from attending the whole 3 years of trials.
    • Their pleads were mostly made under the condition of forcibly ignoring the above given failure of legislation which had became a knowledge of defendants. They totally could not argue about this if they want to break away from the on going trial.
    I urge readers to consider this sort of miscarriage of justice, knowing that the legislation is faulty and ineffective but you have to be forced to plea guilty to charges and be punished, consider this against penalty of imprisonment as Mr Jufri Salim had under went, and imagine if this was a case for death penalty.

    I think it may become necessary for me to add on the high price I had already paid by spending 2 nights in famiLEE LEEgime's Cantonment Mata Chu Lock Up, plus attending whole TBT trials during the last 3 years, I might be forced to add on the stake to defy impending verdicts & sentences in order to highlight the incompetence and unjust of famiLEE LEEgime which ministers draws world's highest salaries and yet can fail like this to legislate by-laws to defend themselves at Parliament & Supreme Court areas, against protesting peasants, by using outdated street name like Parliament Lane which changed in 1999, and meaningless LEFT Bank of Singapore River, in attempting to define an area within which they can arrest and charge protesters. This part is highly unusual as compared with other classic unjust and oppressive legislations from Lee Kuan Yew's famiLEE LEEgime.

    This time they had clearly made simply obvious mistakes that even school pupils can understand within the laws, then arrested and charged more then a dozen activists with broken law. How to comply with a verdict and sentence that you had broken a law that had been broken by it's legislator while make it?

    Sammyboy.Com Thread